<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Next Web, Next Radio</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.newradiostrategies.com/2008/04/03/next-web-next-radio/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.newradiostrategies.com/2008/04/03/next-web-next-radio/</link>
	<description>A Think Tank for Radio in the Digital Age</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 19:11:07 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Robin Valk</title>
		<link>http://www.newradiostrategies.com/2008/04/03/next-web-next-radio/comment-page-1/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>Robin Valk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Apr 2008 12:43:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://newradiostrategies.com/?p=53#comment-4</guid>
		<description>Andrew

Good kit use indeed! Well improvised. I am been regularly gobsmacked about how clever all this new kit is... only to be disappointed by the dull content the kit has enabled. I guess it&#039;s all about accessing worthwhile content, and this is a case in point.

As for Radionomy... let&#039;s see how they stack up once they have resolved the copyright issues, and once they have built a song library that anyone would be proud to use. 100,000 songs does not cut it. Nowhere near big enough to be usable across a broad range of music interests. The other question I have is this: If I can upload my own productions and podcasts, why do I need to go through another  middle man site?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Andrew</p>
<p>Good kit use indeed! Well improvised. I am been regularly gobsmacked about how clever all this new kit is&#8230; only to be disappointed by the dull content the kit has enabled. I guess it&#8217;s all about accessing worthwhile content, and this is a case in point.</p>
<p>As for Radionomy&#8230; let&#8217;s see how they stack up once they have resolved the copyright issues, and once they have built a song library that anyone would be proud to use. 100,000 songs does not cut it. Nowhere near big enough to be usable across a broad range of music interests. The other question I have is this: If I can upload my own productions and podcasts, why do I need to go through another  middle man site?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
