There was a television show back in the eighties called “Radio with Pictures” which played music videos from around the world. The name was nothing more than a snappy oxymoron at the time – but it’s turned out to be rather prescient. The future of radio would seem destined to include pictures of some description…
It stands to reason really. Many of the platforms on which we consume radio now feature a screen: DAB, mobile phone, ipod, computer monitor etc. Which is why the BBC has employed a team of young boffins to investigate the visualisation radio – and ask themselves the pertinent question “What exactly does radio look like?”
Even radio advertising is in on the act… The search for fresh revenue streams has inspired the creative arm of Global Radio to produce audio/visual commercials for clients which are displayed on their stations websites. Simon Forster, the Creative Services Manager for Global’s UK branch in the West Midlands, says the service is proving increasingly popular. They’ve produced over 30 of these “hybrid commercials” this year alone, at very lucrative rates.
“Enhanced podcasts”, such as the ones produced for the Chris Moyles breakfast show, have been around for a while now and have proven their success on the BBC website. (Although these types of files are not universally supported and can cause play-back issues.)
Although mainstream radio may have picked up on the trend towards “visual radio” – more could certainly be made of the opportunity. Switch on any radio station available via freeview, satellite or cable in the UK – and pretty much all you’ll see is a large blank screen staring back at you…
Another form of audio/visual narrative that’s gathering on-line momentum is the “audio-slideshow”. These differ from traditional vodcasts as they utilise still images instead of video and are therefore far easier to produce – and quicker to download.
As the name suggests, viewers/listeners see a series of still images while hearing a complimentary audio documentary. These pictures can be manipulated by cropping, dissolving the image, fading in or out, or directing the viewer’s eye with the “Ken Burns” technique – the name given to the act of moving a still image across the screen. But why try to explain it – when you can, quite literally, see for yourself…
This example comes from photographer David White and producer Ben Chesterton. I first got to know Ben and his family while working on a project in Ethiopia. He was in charge of a BBC World Service Trust project, training journalists to create innovative, often provocative programmes for Radio Ethiopia.
Before his involvement in development radio, Ben had enjoyed an award winning career as a documentary producer for the BBC. I was therefore surprised when he turned his back on traditional radio to start “duckrabbit.info” – a company specialising in bespoke audio-slideshows. I was curious to find out why and invited him answer a series of questions for New Radio Strategies…
As a former producer of traditional documentaries for Radio Four, what was it that attracted you to audio slideshows?
I used them as a training tool for journalists in Kenya. To shake and wake them up and force them out of the studio by confronting them with what was going on in the refugee camps. Apart from that, I love photos and I was becoming creatively frustrated with my work – so I thought I’d have a crack at something different.
Are audio slideshows more closely aligned to visual or audio documentaries?
I think it all depends on the use of the audio slideshow. I mean, at times it might have more in common with the language of art or poetry then documentary. I don’t think it’s got too much to do with radio in the sense that a good slideshow is completely dependent on the visuals to make sense, whereas it might not be so dependant on the audio.
So can they truly be considered a new form of “radio”?
They can be a great way of promoting radio but to call audio slideshows a new form of radio isn’t something I’d agree with. In fact there’s nothing really new about them. What’s new is the publishing platform, the web, which makes them worthwhile because there’s a potentially massive audience.
What are the differences between producing an audio slideshow – compared to producing a purely audio based project?
The major difference is that peoples attention span on the web is very limited so you are looking to contain an audio slideshow to usually around three minutes. For someone who is used to producing half hour docos this is really challenging! The other thing is learning to let the photos lead. At the end of the day it’s the photos that will keep people hooked, or otherwise.
What is the future of audio-slideshows as you see it?
It’s hard to say. I think they will have a limited use on news websites like the BBC. I think that radio people will start to use them to promote radio documentaries, if they can pull some budget together for this. Certainly Radio 4 could do really well promoting some of their stand out documentaries on the BBC website by using audio slideshows. I think commercially they offer a lot of possibilities for organisations to get stories out about themselves. I also think they offer plenty of possibilities for citizen journalism, for the way that everyday life is chronicled. They are also a great way of making art available to many more people on the web, in a way that is engaging and memorable.
Do you have any recommendations for people wanting to make their own slideshows – and where can people go to discover more about audio-slideshows?
Just come to our blog www.duckrabbit.info/blog where we showcase loads of great examples and also links to other great websites doing a similar thing. I recommend the software Soundslides, which is simple and produces great looking slideshows.
You can have all the kit in the world but at the end of the day it’s all about how you tell the story.

No Trackbacks
You can leave a trackback using this URL: http://www.newradiostrategies.com/2008/11/06/radio-with-pictures/trackback/
6 Comments
Who’s that idiot posing with the guy with the gun?
This is a really great way of supporting (rather than trying to overshadow) the audio with images. I’m curious as to how something like this might be applied to music radio.
Any ideas anyone?
I greatly appreciate the information on the slideshow technique. As a listener of WBEZ in Chicago, I greatly enjoy finding such content accompanying a story. I’ve found some newspapers using this technique as well to great effect.
However, I must add that I find it unfortunate that the sole explanation of the image at the top of the page is “so and so in Africa…”
Where are we in Africa? Who is our producer posing with? Is there some reason for the weapon in this African fellow’s hand? Why can’t we have a photo with our producer training Kenyan journalists in the audio slideshows, which would be both more self-explanatory and much more appropriate to the actual content of the post? If we’re learning here about using images to further enhance listeners’ understanding of a story, why does this image do so little to enhance the reader’s understanding here?
Hello CT,
good comments. I didn’t actually know that photo was going to be used and could have provided one from our training in Ethiopia or Kenya as that photo makes me cringe a little, but I think it was the only one the writer had to hand when he was doing the post.
The photo was taken in Ethiopia at the Awash National Park. The man with the gun was our guide. The weapon is for security purposes, although personally I would have felt more secure without it in the back of the car whilst we were bouncing around!
Your comments illustrate the importance of photographs, that you can’t just place anything anywhere and expect to get away with it.
Benjamin http://www.duckrabbit.info/blog
Boo hoo.. A dramatic picture featuring the posts main subject while working for the BBC WST is used and you get all precious. What do you expect – a photo essay? Actually the writer did have other pictures at hand, but they were all rather boring. I’d rather use a provocative image to stimulate interest instead of following CT’s (yawn) predictable path. The fact that the picture made you want to find out more is exactly its strength. Job done.
As for you Chesterton – you wimp – your comments simply illustrate the importance of editorial freedom. PS. I’m not changing it either – so actually, I did get away with it. Ha!
I’m just picking myself off the floor with laughter.
CT I know Sam to be a very nice man, this is most out of character.
As for being a wimp? Fair comment but if Sam really wanted to draw the readers in he could have featured one of those shots with him and all his lovely dancing girl friends from Memos in Addis Adaba.